Article "Fort McLoughlin" in English Wikipedia has 28.2 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 16 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article "Fort McLoughlin", its content was written by 15 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 15 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 70 times in English Wikipedia and cited 70 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #1532905 12.2009 |
Global: #2567767 12.2009 |
| Best Rank | English: #215667 08.2008 |
Global: #478554 08.2008 |
On 30 May 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Feast of Corpus Christi, YouTube, Vincent Kompany, Hansi Flick, UEFA Europa Conference League, deaths in 2024, ChatGPT, Olympiacos F.C., Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, UEFA Euro 2024.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Donald Trump, Deaths in 2024, 2024 South African general election, Furiosa (film), YouTube, Next Indian general election, Willie Nelson, Giles Corey, Murder of Reena Virk, Project 2025.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(18.45+13.22+0+35.71+73.73)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
